tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4744762735048025778.post1084116765272105356..comments2009-10-24T17:22:55.985-07:00Bob Briscohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07258585706210271803noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4744762735048025778.post-51799128046404179732009-10-18T19:53:00.228-07:002009-10-18T19:53:00.228-07:00Data storage limits should not be a problem as long as content can continue to be monetized and allow us to justify the increased cost of more storage.. also keep in mind that with the cost of data storage continuing to drop it becomes even less of a problem.<br /><br />Bandwidth on the other hand is a much bigger issue, especially with the increasing demand for video content. Google spends hundreds of millions of dollars/year in bandwidth for Youtube... currently advertising revenue for YouTube is less then the cost required to operate it however newer compression technologies are now being rolled out to help drive these costs lower. As google becomes better at monetizing their video content they&#39;ll begin generating profits instead of losses.Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01602279648479363970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4744762735048025778.post-2875397229042162302009-09-17T11:17:56.916-07:002009-09-17T11:17:56.916-07:00Is there a real world limit to the amount of UGC content possible due to data storage limits? <br /><br />Or is the current thinking that data storage capacity will continue to get both exponentially better and less expensive?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com